• GIMBA OBADIAH JONATHAN Federal University Lafia
Keywords: Bilateral trade, Gravity model, Panel data, Random effect


This paper seeks to examine the determinant of bilateral trade between China and Africa using the gravity model of international trade. Panel data was used for ten African countries from 2000 to 2016. The generalized least squares random effect estimation technique was employed. The study used the standard gravity model and integrates population, exchange rate and strategic partnership. The study finds out that China’s GDP, Africa’s GDP, population of Africa, geographical distance, exchange rate and strategic partnership have significant impact on China’s trade Africa. China’s population is not a determining factor of trade flow with Africa. The study recommends that to increase bilateral trade flow between the two economies, there should be a robust strategic trade partnership that will eliminate most barriers to trade thereby creating easy flow of goods. African countries closer to China should take advantage of the proximity and trade more and Africa should export more of finished goods to China which will increase its GDP.

Author Biography

GIMBA OBADIAH JONATHAN, Federal University Lafia

Department of Economics


Batra, A. (2006). India’s global trade potential: The gravity model approach. Global Economic Review, 35(3), 327 – 361.
Binh, D.T., Duong, N.V., & Cuong, H.M. (2012). Applying the gravity model to analyse trade activities of Vietnam.
Chua, S.Y., & Sharma, S.C. (1998). An investigation of the effects of prices and exchange rates on trade flows in East Asia. Asian Economic Journal, 2(3), 253 – 271.
Frankel, J. (1997). Regional trading blocs in the world economic system. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.
George, T., & Mohammed, A. A., (2009). The changing trade pattern of emerging economies: Gravity model of Ghana’s trade flow. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Gul, N. & Yasin, H.M (2011). The trade potential of Pakistan: An application of the gravity model. The Lahore Journal of Economics,16(1), 23 – 62.
Haveman, J. (2010). Useful gravity model data l)25 March 2010).
Khan, A.H., & Mahmood, Z. (2000). Pakistan and emerging global trading environment.
Lahore: Vanguard Books.
Krugman, P.R., & Obstfeld, M. (2005). International Economics: Theory and Practice. (7th ed.).
Boston MA: Adisson – Wesley.
Li, A., (2007). China and Africa: Policy and Challenges. China Security, 3(3), 69 – 93.
Oguledo, V.I., & Macphee, C.R (1994). Gravity model: A reformulation and an application to discriminatory trade arrangement. Applied Economics, 26(2), 107 – 120.
Rahman, M.M., (2003). A panel data analysis of Bangladesh trade: the gravity model approach.
University of Sydney. Retrieved from: Rasoulinezhad, E., & Kang, G.S (2016). A panel data analysis of South Korea’s trade with
OPEC member countries. The gravity model approach. Iranian Economic Review, 20(2), 203 – 224.
Renard, M.F. (2011). China’s trade and FDI in Africa. Series No. 126, African Development Bank, Tunis, Tunisia.
Sohn, C.H (2001). A gravity model analysis of Korea’s trade pattern and the effect of a regional trading arrangement. Korea Institute for International Economic Policy. Working paper series. Vol. 2001 – 2009.
Srivastava, R.K., & Green, R.T., (1986). Determinants of bilateral trade flows. The Journal of Business. 59(4), 623. Research collection of Lee Kong Chian School of Business.
Thai, T.D., (2006). A gravity model for trade between Vietnam and twenty-three European countries.
Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. The Twentieth Century Fund, New York.

UNCTAD Country-specific Lists of Bilateral Investment Treaties (2014). Retrieved from
%29/Country-specific-Lists-of-BITs.aspx. [28 January 2014].
World Integrated Trade Solutions Data Base of the World Bank (2016). Retrieved from. http//